I Thought Only I Spent Time Analyzing T-Shirts
R. Alex Whitlock
Poor Man:
So I was in the Chipotle the other day, as is my lunchtime custom, preparing to order my half a chicken fajita burrito. And there were two teenagers in front of me a little way, with matching black oversized tee-shirts, baggy black combat shorts and orthopedic boots. The tee-shirts were from some devil rock band of recent vintage, and they had gothic upside-down crosses on them, and a gothic-font legend which read "I vomit remains at Christian filth." I don't know what band it was, and the phrase appears no where on Google, except here, I guess. And I'm standing in line with my friend, who is really quite extraordinarily Christian, and we're both sort of pretending we aren't trying to read what the tee-shirts say, and it's very awkward. And then I spend the next few minutes trying to figure out what that mysterious phrase could possibly mean. Remains? Human remains? Whose remains? If you eat human remains, why are you on line with me at Chipotle? And then I start staring at the steaming bucket of carnitas, and start feeling a bit queasy, and by the time we sit down to eat my appetite is gone.

He goes on to question society's tolerance of anti-Christian paraphinalia. It's an odd thing, but I can't muster as much anger as I would if it had been directed at Muslims or whatnot. Of course, unlike Andrew, I wasn't put in such an uncomfortable position because of it.

As the commenters point out, it's likely simply the oh-so-serious social critique of a bored kid whose dissatisfaction with his fascistic curfew gets aimed at society-at-large, specifically Christian. The same sort of thing can be seen in anti-American "statements" that are devoid of any thoughtful critique. Since 9-11 (and before, probably) Christianity proves an easier target than does our nation.

I suppose that the reason I can't muster much outrage is that pro-Christianity symbols are pretty much everywhere. For every bumper sticker that says "Christianity Preys On Children" there's ten that say "Jesus Saves" and for every Darwinian fish with legs there's three of the genuine article.

It's hard, and even feels a bit unfair, to get all huffy about someone so proudly in the minority.

On a side note, though, anyone who goes to a fantasy/sci-fi/anime/comics convention ought to take the time to check out the stand selling bumper stickers (if there is one). Every year at A-kon, I spend an hour or two just walking around the parking lot looking at all the funny, punny, and interesting bumper decorations.
Posted to Guiding Lights
 
 

Observations

 
The Tortured Artist wrote:
When my wife and I went to see X-Men II she pointed out something that I hadn't really noticed: there was actually a portrayal of a devout Christian that was (for the most part) positive. Alan Cumming's Nightcrawler, while a mutant and slightly "touched," was largely positive and not the stereotypical evangelical Christian you often see in films.

He wasn't preachy, didn't try to convert anyone, used his faith as a source of strength, and acknowledged that he wasn't perfect (one tattoo for each sin...).

While I'm not a devout Christian, (I'm not sure what I am) it was nice to see a balanced treatment of a religious figure. I wish we saw more of that and fewer stereotypes in the media. I'd like to see a Buddhist that gets mad. I'd like to see a Muslim that isn't working on a bomb. I'd like to see a Jew eating a BLT.

I've seen all of those things in real life.

Christians are like white males: one of the few "acceptable" targets of ridicule in our oh-so-tolerant society.
7/24/2003
 
RAW wrote:
I haven't seen X-Men II (intended to, made plans to, didn't follow through), but I've heard good things about that movie and especially about Nightcrawler's characterization.

What's ironic about the portrayal of Christians is that each one that puts them forth as a bigot thinks that they are really breaking new ground and being "edgy" completely ignoring that the media portrayals of devout Christians runs probably 90% in the negative.

It's an interesting point on the white males being easy targets. I find attacks on whites pretty easy to stomach and rarely get defensive, but I usually answer attacks on men with some defensiveness.

I guess that rolls back to the majority/not criterion I mentioned in the post.

Oh, and "The Angry Monk" sounds like a sitcom, but a cool one :).
7/24/2003

Add an Observation

Comment spam is an ongoing problems that we're trying to address. Previously we required people to create accounts and log in. I am thankful to say that is no longer the case. We're giving Captcha another try and are playing around with a text-based Q&A variant of Captcha. So bear with us as we try to figure out how to best get a handle ont he problem. Please note that any comment on a post more than 30 days old will go into the moderation queue, where I will get to it when I can which could be once a week.

:

:
:



 

 

Home || RSS || Archives || Ten Second News || FURL || Blogrolodexical (Full)