This Is War
Art Sammler
The Prince of Wales has apparently decided that present global warming rhetoric is overly restrained:
Britain can lead the fight against climate change using the same spirit of grit it displayed in World War Two, Prince Charles told business leaders on Tuesday.
.... “Just think what they did in the last war,” he said, referring to Britain’s allied victory against Germany. “Things that seemed impossible were achieved almost overnight.”
.... And he used the date to recall his days in Britain’s navy, and evoke the urgent danger posed by climate change.
“When I was serving in the Royal Navy ... “May Day, May Day, May Day” was the distress call used in cases of emergency. It still is - and this is an emergency we face.”

If we are in a war, then we should act accordingly. What are our weapons?
We can actively sequester carbon, as suggested by Gregory Benford:

Yearly, we manage through agriculture far more carbon than is causing our greenhouse dilemma.
Take advantage of that. The leftover corn cobs and stalks from our fields can be gathered up, floated down the Mississippi, and dropped into the ocean, sequestering it. Below about a kilometer depth, beneath a layer called the thermocline, nothing gets mixed back into the air for a thousand years or more. It's not a forever solution, but it would buy us and our descendents time to find such answers. And it is inexpensive; cost matters.

We can reduce the albedo of polar regions, by seeding the high atmosphere with extremely fine particles:
He suggests suspension of tiny, harmless particles (sized at one-third of a micron) at about 80,000 feet up in the stratosphere. These particles could be composed of diatomaceous earth. "That's silicon dioxide, which is chemically inert, cheap as earth, and readily crushable to the size we want," Benford says. This could initially be tested, he says, over the Arctic, where warming is already considerable and where few human beings live. Arctic atmospheric circulation patterns would mostly confine the deployed particles around the North Pole. An initial experiment could occur north of 70 degrees latitude, over the Arctic Sea and outside national boundaries. "The fact that such an experiment is reversible is just as important as the fact that it's regional," says Benford.

We can fertilize part of the ocean, increasing its uptake of atmospheric carbon:
The idea is similar to planting forests full of carbon-inhaling trees, but in desolate stretches of ocean. “This is organic gardening, not rocket science,” said Russ George, the chief executive of Planktos, the company behind the WeatherBird II project. “Can it possibly be as easy as we say it is? We’re about to find out.”
For Mr. George, this is not just science and environmentalism but business, possibly big business.

We can finally act like adults about nuclear energy.

These and other solutions are there for the finding. The situation is well summarized by the awesome Jonathan Rauch:
climate change is real and deserves action, but...the problem is nowhere near as overwhelming as the rhetoric commonly suggests, and the solutions nowhere near as difficult. As problems go, in fact, climate change appears to be one of the most convenient that humankind has ever faced.

Or, of course, we could do what Prince Charles, George Monbiot, and their millions of followers are suggesting, and fight global warming by reducing output, or even humanity itself, flirting with a New Dark Age of economic and scientific stagnation, suffocation of freedom, and zero-sum contention for resources that need not even remain scarce.
Posted to Miscellaneous
 
 

Observations

 
ApaulO wrote:
change the Or to And at the beginning of the last paragraph... and you've captured it perfectly.
5/3/2007
 
Heidi Marion wrote:
Replace conventional(1) agricultural practices with eco-farming(2) practices.

On a world scale, this would sequester enough carbon to cause global carbon neutrality(3).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1. Conventional agriculture is the industry responsible for the greatest carbon pollution because of its reliance on fossil fuels. (Creating synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, shipping these products around the world, using these products which results in impoverished and eventually failed soils.)

2. Eco-farming results in a net sequestration of carbon by employing methods like: No bare soils to stop erosion and carbon loss; Crop rotation; Turning manure and food waste into compost and using that to feed & build soil; Crop diversity, Encouraging people to eat from their local farms.

3. <card.iastate.edu/environment/items/choices_article_carbon.pdf>
<cmasc.osu.edu/about/data.pdf> <casmgs.colostate.edu/>
<fao.org/ag/agl/agll/carbonsequestration
5/3/2007
 
Kathryn wrote:
Amazingly refreshing!!! Maybe the Prince, like Gore can do more without the title and responsibiities of national governmental leadership. Let's cheer the old boy on!!!
5/6/2007

Add an Observation

Comment spam is an ongoing problems that we're trying to address. Previously we required people to create accounts and log in. I am thankful to say that is no longer the case. We're giving Captcha another try and are playing around with a text-based Q&A variant of Captcha. So bear with us as we try to figure out how to best get a handle ont he problem. Please note that any comment on a post more than 30 days old will go into the moderation queue, where I will get to it when I can which could be once a week.

:

:
:



 

 

Home || RSS || Archives || Ten Second News || FURL || Blogrolodexical (Full)