Point-Counterpoint on DeLay
R. Alex Whitlock
From RedState.org:

On one hand:
The pity is that Republicans who care more about their party than about the cult of personality attendant to its key figures have long warned of this day. We knew all along that Tom DeLay was a bully — ask the Heritage Foundation about his penchant for petty grudges. We knew all along that he was, on a fundamental level, unprincipled — ask him about the fat in the Federal budget. We knew all along that he was mostly interested in power for its own sake — recall, please, that he sought a House rules change to protect his leadership position in this very circumstance. And we knew that if it came to an indictment, it would be the end.

On the other:
As much as I would love for Tom DeLay to quietly fade away from the national spotlight, having him resign over trumped-up and quite possibly fraudulent charges would be a mistake of the highest order.

Trevino is right, he is a liability. However, if he were to step down on these charges he'd be creating an even bigger one.

Given the adage that politics is a slightly more polite version of warfare, what Trevino proposes is another Munich. Bowing to politically-oriented prosecutions like that is only going to emboldened more shamelessly partisan hacks like Earle to go after other Republican leaders with trumped-up charges.

Supporting DeLay may make many of us want to take a shower afterwards, but it's ultimately necessary to prevent others more noble from suffering the same fate.

Posted to Opposite of Progress
 
 

Observations

 
publiustx wrote:
>>We knew all along that he was mostly interested in power for its own sake <<

I think this is inaccurate.

Whether one likes Tom DeLay or not, I think it's inaccurate to say he sought power for personal gain. Much about the man's life says that simply is untrue.

Now, a person is on much firmer ground if they say he sought power for the sake of his party and its agenda.

There's no doubt the man has been one of the most influential Republican party builders in the last 50 years, maybe longer. Whether one believes that's good or bad, or he's done it the right way or not, I just don't think we can deny that as a fundamental truth.
9/30/2005

Add an Observation

Comment spam is an ongoing problems that we're trying to address. Previously we required people to create accounts and log in. I am thankful to say that is no longer the case. We're giving Captcha another try and are playing around with a text-based Q&A variant of Captcha. So bear with us as we try to figure out how to best get a handle ont he problem. Please note that any comment on a post more than 30 days old will go into the moderation queue, where I will get to it when I can which could be once a week.

:

:
:



 

 

Home || RSS || Archives || Ten Second News || FURL || Blogrolodexical (Full)