Jump to navigation
DeLayed Conflict
R. Alex Whitlock
With the exception of my ill-conceived 1996 vote where I'd thought that I was in Ken Bentsen's district and this last election where I voted in Idaho, I've voted against Tom DeLay at every opportunity. I even volunteered for an opponent of his. I take no pride in having grown up in his district. On the whole, though, I think he's been good for congressional Republicans and an effective leader. The absense of such leadership on the Senate side of things has actually made me [mutter, mutter] appreciate him at least a little. On the whole, though, I'd prefer him out.
So what do I think now that he's been
indicted? Not much, actually. I decline to believe that his prosecutor's intentions are of the noblest sort. Be that as it may, it DeLay's guilty of the crimes that he's accused of none of this matters.
It's not at all impossible to railroad an indictment of an innocent man, though getting a conviction is much harder. But I believe him guilty. So I'm mostly just waiting to see what comes of it all.
I think he's guilty, but that and thirty-seven cents will get you a postal stamp.
What's interesting and fun and sad is that they'll likely make a big deal of running against DeLay a year from now and still won't win back the House because it's so institutionally favorable to Republicans right now. It's interesting because that sort of stuff interest me. It's fun because... well it's fun for all the wrong reasons. And it's sad because the the no party's control over the House ought to be bulletproof.
buy cheap softwarecheap softwareoem softwarecheap adobe acrobat
 
Observations
 
>>I think he's guilty<<
Ah, but guilty of what?
That he MAY HAVE talked to the other people Earle indicted about something nefarious?
Seriously, the indictment reads that ambiguously. I don't think there's much "there" to it.
My question is -- if this thing gets tossed like the Hutchison fiasco, will Earle stand to receive any sanctions for prosecutorial abuse?
 
publiustx-
Our justice system would have to be fixed first. The more lawsuits I see, the less reasons people have for starting them. It's become a system of acuse first, find evidence later, which is not what our justice system is for.
I don't care much for politics, I think the whole system needs to be reinvented (or at least cleaned thoroughly with disinfectant). But of things I do care about...technology...there is all kinds of crazy crap going on in the legal system.
 
Kevin, by most accounts the indictment looks pretty weak. What makes me most curious is "Why now?" If Earle is just fishing, one would think that he would fish in the run-up to an election. Maybe he's determined that there's not much else to find or maybe this is a step towards getting clearance for bigger finds. I'm not in a position to know, really, but when the Washington Post is (mildly) coming to DeLay's defense, something seems to be amiss.
 
RAW,
After looking into the history of Earle, I'm not so convinced. Previous too-similar-for-comfort cases (the Hutchison indictment which was laughed out of court comes to mind too vividly) indicate that this is possibly a smear tactic, possibly worse.
And as for the timing, politically motivated indictments take just as long as normal ones to come up, and this one was initiated by Chris Bell after he lost his seat in redistricting (three guesses who the Dems all blamed for the redistricting)...
Add an Observation
Comment spam is an ongoing problems that we're trying to address. Previously we required people to create accounts and log in. I am thankful to say that is no longer the case. We're giving Captcha another try and are playing around with a text-based Q&A variant of Captcha. So bear with us as we try to figure out how to best get a handle ont he problem. Please note that any comment on a post more than 30 days old will go into the moderation queue, where I will get to it when I can which could be once a week.