Jump to navigation
First Posted Post Left Posted on Katrita... Maybe
R. Alex Whitlock
I've more-or-less kept quiet on this site about what I think regarding Katrina and Rita. I pulled on impassioned post almost as quickly as I put it up and I have a couple others in my drafts bin, probably never to see the light of day. I am reluctant to say much because I don't think that there's a dialogue as much as a bunch of folks shouting from the rooftops with megaphones, passionately screaming how this completely validates whatever they thought before the storms even struck. I continue to believe that a lot of people - on both the right and left - would rather shout themselves hoarse than re-evaluate their beliefs enough to understand that crappy things happen and it's not always the other team's fault and your team did not do (or would not do given the opportunity) everything as well as it could have.
Time passes, though, and these days I'm only a little annoyed at those who suggest that the massive traffic buildups caused by over 2.5 million people leaving a city in the course of 48 hours is evidence of gross incompetence on the part of... well, somebody, preferably someone they didn't like before Rita was even christened. As this was Houston's first large-scale evacuation in decades it's a little bit idealistic, in my view, to expect things to go great. The lesson for Katrina was "Everybody get the hell out!" while the lesson for Rita was "Well maybe not everybody!" and "don't forget the contraflow!"
Every mistake, I think, is determined to lead to another mistake of the opposing variety. Unless, of course, enough time has passed that we forgot the original mistake enough to repeat it.
I carry no water for Houston Mayor Bill White or Texas Governor Rick Perry. I voted for Perry, reluctantly, based almost entirely on political ideas and not out of any affection for him (I voted against him in 1998). I didn't vote in the Houston mayoral elections, though if I had I don't know who I would have voted for. I disagree with a lot of White's ideas, but I get the sense of a competent man doing a decent job. I've voted for Harris County Judge Eckles on an occasion or two, but he never faced much in the way of serious opposition. If none of these men are in office two years from now I would likely not really care (depending, of course, on who succeeds them).
I spent much of Thursday worried sick about my brother, headed for San Antonio when there was a hurricane headed right for Galveston Bay. I wasn't stuck out there, but I am not dispassionate about the possibility that things could have gone very, very badly.
But from where I stand the officials involved at least served up par. I know a lot of people are irate, but it's my belief that a lot of people have lost sight that hurricanes suck and they’re difficult to deal when people haven’t in a time, and asking for comfort in the face of Category 5 (or a Cat 4) is asking too much. I'm not saying that things could not have gone better nor that we should not work to improve the plan and make it better, just that this was inherently going to be chaotic.
Katrina helped in terms of dusting off the emergency plans, but it’s also made everything a lot more stressful (As
Ethan says, "We've seen this movie before"). They’re all politicians and they all want to avoid the blame that was flung at New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin. The fact that so many have basically accused Nagin, Blanco, FEMA, and Bush of murder for failure to act did little to keep heads level this time around. That's not to defend those involved in Katrina, but it is to say that a lot of the rhetoric is utterly unhelpful even when true. Holding a leader accountable for each and every last one of its citizens is unrealistic in the extreme.
The object lesson here for me is that these guys can’t win. Many say Louisiana waited too long to call the evacuation and now many are suggesting that Texas called it too early. Too many people left behind followed by too many people on the road. Officials from all levels were seemingly too lax in Louisiana and it appears they may have been too spastic in Texas. And too slow. And just... imperfect, dammit.
One of the reasons that I fall to the right of center is that I don't expect terribly much from our government. I expect better than Bush's appointments for FEMA, but on the whole I'm not so much outraged that so little was done as I am that the government is spending so much to do so little. It's a point-of-view that I am beginning to understand to be irreconcilable to those on the left. I haven't much interest in having that fight, but Rita at least gave me a clearer idea of where the battle lines are drawn. Rita let me understand that for the outraged on the left it was not all about getting Bush like it seemed to be. They honestly have expectations that they dare to hold even though I personally find them to be unreasonable. I needed to see that, even though I don't know what to do with it having done so.
We've got to get better at this in the ways that we can do better than this. Even though I don't believe it to be nearly as simple as critics of the Houston evacuation believe it to be, maybe there are ways that we can get contraflow open sooner. There ought to be ways to get gas out there quicker. By all means, let's have this conversation. But let's look at the big picture. Let's look at what worked as well as what didn't. Let's look at things we didn't even think about that may be perfectly obvious in hindsight. But that's not going to happen as long as the media and the critics are focused solely on what went wrong. As the Katrina-to-Rita transition demonstrated, in my mind, that only leads to the equal-and-opposing mistakes.
Now, being a heartless, short-sighted conservative, my main interest begins in Houston and ends in Texas (okay, I guess considering my betrothed, ends in Lousiana). That's where Houstonians (even ones that live in Idaho) need to focus. Miamians need to focus on Miami, Mobilians (??) on Mobile, and so on. Just like those on the left seem to honestly believe that the government can work at a level I find to be unrealistic, I hope they understand that I (and many others on the right) honestly believe that this is best handled on the local level with federal assistance but
not federal direction. I would honestly rather former Houston Mayor Lee P. Brown lead the evacuation than President George W. Bush.
President Bush has heeded the cries of those who hold the federal government accountable and wants to take complete control of the situation. I'm tempted to say that his critics should be careful what they ask for, but that's not very helpful. Instead I will simply say that I believe that the federal government's ability to handle the situation (under any administration) is limited and that I hope to God that city and state officials are figuring out what to do on their own if and when the federal government is slow to respond. And I hope that individual citizens are trying to figure out what they should do if and when the state and local governments are slow to respond.
I am not very hopeful on all this. While the post-Rita-evac recriminations help me understand how minds that work differently from my own work, it also points out that people are, in general, reactive. We want everything to go flawlessly. When things don't happen that way, we go after one another. We're either too lackadaisal in the face of disaster or we're too panicky. We're whatever we shouldn't have been because that's the only reason that people could be deathly uncomfortable for hours or days on end and could die. Ordinarily I might appreciate a public that refuses to accept things as they are, but in this case they want someone else to change it. And we seem to declare it in such a way that assures we will never get it.
Every now and again I will look back at something I wrote a few years ago and be astounded that I wrote it. I will be astonished at how wrong I was. I really hope that a couple years from now I will look back at this post in a similar manner.
buy cheap softwarecheap softwareoem softwarecheap adobe acrobat
 
Observations
 
>>I continue to believe that a lot of people - on both the right and left - would rather shout themselves hoarse than re-evaluate their beliefs enough to understand that crappy things happen and it's not always the other team's fault and your team did not do (or would not do given the opportunity) everything as well as it could have.<<
Preach on Brother Whitlock!
During this sort of crisis, I don't even want to HEAR the word "team" or "Republican" or "Democrat" -- I want to know that our duly elected officials are getting the job done. Or not.
You may have seen on bH the reference to a gnat-blogger who was buzzing about something I posted (with NO reference to party) and recasting it in partisan terms -- yet the same gnat professed 100% agreement with a Ken Hoffman article that expressed nearly the exact sentiment I did. But Hoffman isn't on the wrong "team" like I am. It's just bizarre.
You know well that I have some serious policy disagreement with Mayor White, and I have real issues with his technocratic-progressive political philosophy (however much he tries to stealth it). However, I thought he performed well in this crisis, and his tendency to want to micromanage everything probably served him and others well (along with his ability to bring people togethere). Ditto Judge Eckels and Governor Perry. Their work was not Republican or Democrat, it was just solid.
On the other hand, we saw some real problems with state/local government in LA without regard to party.
Surely we can try and assess these things without regard to our "teams." Surely.
 
So far I have only one comment on Katrina: the evacuation need not have been as crowded a traffic disaster as it was, but that is not the fault of our leadership for the most part.
Really and truthfully, I watched what was going on. The reason we had traffic jams was simple: those who *really* needed to get out were competing with those who were scared by the hype into leaving anyways.
Yes, this means fundamentally going back and fixing some of the possible evacuation plans. Yes, it means we probably SHOULD have rolling shutdowns of freeway on-ramps beyond a certain point.
For instance, in my neighborhood, there were plenty of people who evacuated. Even though we are about 90 to 100 miles from the coast, and not in a flood plain. These people jammed up roadways that should have been left for those who were under mandatory evacuation.
I could go on and on, but that's the problem in a nutshell. Too many people got hit by the "get out get out oh my god get out" hype, didn't evaluate their situation properly, and didn't let those who would REALLY have been in jeopardy should the thing have come our way, get out first.
Shame on them. Shame on us.
But hopefully we'll have better plans in place (serious onramp closings, earlier contra-flow designs) for next time.
 
I will simply say "dey took ar jarbs!"
(Couldn't resist the South Park reference.)
Alex, not sure if you saw my announcement over at TVT but I will indeed be cranking out the post-storm analysis in a dry, cold, scientific, nonpartisan way. As the above commenters have said, this is something that is a much deeper problem that can't be waved away by simply assigning blame and "fixing" with a hackneyed political solution.
But there is plenty of blame to assign, and I expect that the hackneyed political solutions are ten deep right now.
 
Another good post, Alex. I've been a bit defensive all along regarding the "expectations" of Americans in these situations. Any comments I have made may come off as partisan because I was defending the Administration, but that's only because, at the time, it was the Administration that was being attacked.
The problem demonstrated by both Katrina and Rita is that we have no concept of what is logistically possible. I've listen to commenter after commenter assume that, somehow, it is possible to mobilize large groups of people and get them into an area where there are not roads, food, drinkable water, electricity, or communications in a day or two. Somehow we've let unreasonable expectations become the norm. Traffic jams during Rita are no more the fault of government, than running out of bread during a snow storm is the fault of the grocery store.
I know it's unpopular to say it, but individual "victims" are not taking enough blame here. Sure, we can't blame the aged or handicapped, but I'm not going to let an able-bodied person off the hook for not evacuating because they are "poor." I keep flashing to Bill Munny's response in Unforgiven when Little Bill castigates him for shooting the unarmed bartender: "Well, he should have armed himself."
 
Kevin, I've tried keeping up with some of the gnats, but it's not worth the rise in blood pressure anymore for me. It doesn't matter how "centrist" you are when you're more partisan than people with much less when you consider people just on the other side of center as bad as or worse than the most immoderate on your own. Treating the radical left wing and the center-right does not constitute centrism. I should post on this at some point.
 
Mike, I'm a bit more reticent to condemn the city folks from taking the first train out of town. There's no way that I would have stayed in my Galleria-area apartment, for instance, because I'd have to spend the entirety of the hurricane in a closet because of the walls-o-glass. A lot of the structures were not built to weather hurricanes. I think too many people took too many cars, but I'm not as clear on what to do about that. Maybe cutting off the entrances and putting those in hurricane-susceptible housing at risk is the only way, but I'm not certain of that.
 
Ethan, I saw that. I look forward to the the post. I think that there is a lot to be learned by the various things that went wrong in Houston and New Orleans. I don't think that we're going to learn them, but we'll see what comes of it. I fear that hackneyed solutions are indeed the order of the day, both from noises eminating from the White House and its congressional critics.
 
Centinel, I was reflexively defensive of the administration as well. And like you, I think that the demands that everything go off without a hitch are unrealistic. My main beef with the partisans on the right are with those that quickly went from "Everything is going great!" to "It's all the fault of local officials!"
I can't fault your relatively low expectations of what the government can accomplish as I share them.
 
RAW,
Windows can be taped up. And if you're in housing that isn't safe according to your standards, sure you should go.
However, there's something to be said about an orderly plan. When someone lives an hour south of you and are in a bona fide flood plain, I think that getting them out first is better than having the both of you on the road at the same time.
Look at it this way: had the I-45 onramps (as an example) been closed from, say, Scott Street up to FM 1960 or somesuch, that would have lessened a lot of the congestion we saw. Had the evacuation orders been "Get the folks from Galveston out, everyone else stay put until it's your turn" rather than "run for the hills the sky is falling", we'd have had a much more orderly evacuation.
What we had, however, was pure chaos because of sensationalist media, government workers who echoed the "get out while you can" rather than the "get out in an orderly fashion" idea, and for that matter because we've let all our disaster plans lapse for decades now.
 
Mike, My folks and my brother live a skip and a hop from Galveston Bay and Clear Lake. Believe me, I'm aware of the increased importance of those people being able to get out. And orderly is great, but how realistic is it without putting up barriers inside the city? Maybe the answer is putting the barriers up for Wednesday only and then allowing Thursday and Friday for the rest to get out. I'm open to that, maybe. Orderly evacuation (or semi-orderly or attempted orderly) is more palatable to me than enforcing a limited evacuation.
 
Mike: word on the street is, tape does squat. in some cases, they even have been known to advise against it. Just fyi.
 
After sitting in the evacuation for 14 hours myself I have little criticism of it. Of course, I was told it would take 24 hours to get from Clear Lake to the woodlands a month prior to the actual evac, so 14 hours seemed good! I agree we need to learn from our mistakes, but let's be realistic. You aren't going to get 2.7 million people out of a city in a few hours! Good post :)
They need to address the gas situation, but people who didn't prepare and bring food and water for themselves weren't thinking straight.
 
Adrian,
The point of taping the window is to lessen the chance of glass flying about.
Admittedly, if your wall comes down, you've got worse issues.
However, from personal experience, tape is effective at the primary purpose - stopping (or lessening) the amount of glass flying around should a window break. Admittedly better at preventing it would be tinting cellophane or something similar, or a layer of protection such as the windshield of a car gets, or perhaps a good stout plywood board, but in a pinch I'd rather have taped the windows than done nothing at all.
 
RE: tape....
Does it do ANYTHING for double paned windows?
For some reason, I'm under the impression that the adhesive in a double paned window would solve the shattering glass problem, but I could be wrong about that. Hell, maybe it's not even an adhesive.
Anybody know?
Add an Observation
Comment spam is an ongoing problems that we're trying to address. Previously we required people to create accounts and log in. I am thankful to say that is no longer the case. We're giving Captcha another try and are playing around with a text-based Q&A variant of Captcha. So bear with us as we try to figure out how to best get a handle ont he problem. Please note that any comment on a post more than 30 days old will go into the moderation queue, where I will get to it when I can which could be once a week.