Baby Names
R. Alex Whitlock
Eel has a pet peeve: Yuppy names.

It struck me as an odd pet peeve at first. Why would anyone pick that, of all things, to have a pet peeve about? But since she's been delivering babies and assisting the deliverance of babies, it makes more sense than, for instance, my catastrophic loss vulnerability to finger-nail polish. She gets a lot of weird names day in and day out. Since getting up here I am in complete agreement with her. You would not believe the names that people up here have. One of my trainer's names at OmniStar was actually named Laetwynn (not a psuedonym!) and when they were talking about their families up there, I'd say the name Kaden was far more prevalent than the name Chris. Part of the rationale for this is for originality. But an article from Health & Medical News says that they might should hold their horses in that regard:
Some parents today who invent some original name for their baby, like 'Grast', could - through simple random chance - unwittingly be determining the names of thousands of children 10 years from now," said Bentley, of the college's Centre for the Evolutionary Analysis of Cultural Behaviour, which uses biological ideas to understand cultural change.

Using British and U.S. government data, Bentley and Hahn tracked the popularity of the top 1,000 first names for baby girls and boys in the U.S. for every decade in the 20th century.

They found that a few names were thousands of times more popular than the majority with many uncommon names. They said the distribution followed an "elegant mathematical function," called a power law, that is maintained over 100 years, even though the population is growing.

Hahn and Bentley developed a model which closely predicts the distribution of name popularity over the last century. The model is based on the population genetics concept of 'random genetic drift', in which the frequency of genes in a population fluctuates according to chance, and where there is only a small population of breeding parents.

The most yuppy name that I ever considered was Bailey, if Anna and I had a boy. It would actually be Rayford Baylor Whitlock with Bailey shorthand (yes, I'm aware that Bailey and Baylor are both 6 letters, but Charles and Charlie are both seven with the shorthand name having more syllables than the formal one). That would have been allowed because Baylor is a family name (I'm somehow actually related to the University's founder on my mother's side of the family). The chosen girl's name was Jodine Clair Whitlock, Jodie for short, named after grandrelatives. Eel will have to tell me whether that's yuppy of not :).

One name that hadn't been born yet and that I doubt I will consider in the future is ESPN. But apparently I'm behind the curve on that:
His parents said ESPN loves baseball, basketball and football, and Rebecca said she's hoping to have his room done in sports theme before the TV ESPN comes.

And, of course, ESPN enjoys watching SportsCenter every night with his father.

However, Michael and Rebecca said they don't think the name will put pressure on him to become a superstar athlete; they're just catering to his interests at the moment.

All in all, Rebecca said, she likes unique names. She wanted to name her two younger daughters "Disney" but was shot down both times by Michael. They compromised on Sterling, now 21 months, and Kendall, now 11 months.

If the McCalls have another son, would he be "The Deuce?"

Well, if ESPN had a twin, his name would be "EXPN." However, the McCalls don't watch solely ESPN for their sports. They planned "Fox Sports McCall" for a second son.

Espen (the way it's supposed to be pronounced) would be a yuppy name. I think it would be a disservice to yuppy names to call ESPN a yuppy name.

Keywords: CamilleLafitte AnnaMcloed

Posted to Generations
 
 

Observations

 
Linus wrote:
I doubt many "newly-invented" names will catch on. Most popular first names come from the Bible or other religious documents - Mohammed is the most common first name in the world. So unless the second coming is led by a Grast, I don't anticipate that becoming a popular name.

That being said, I think Laetwynn sounds kinda cool, and wouldn't be a lame thing to name your kid if you've got Celtic heritage.
6/30/2004
 
R. Alex wrote:
As far as men go, there's a good chance you're right. On the other hand, most people I know named Josh are not named after the biblical Joshua and other names like mine (both the R-name and Alexander) are not biblical in nature as far as I know. They have a lot of history now, but that history did indeed have to start somewhere.

Women's names are less biblical in nature and as near as I can tell much more prone to being tagged with "new" names. Some of the increasingly popular female names have no historical relevence beyond that Kevin Kline movie (Madison - "son of Maud") or gawd-knows-where (Mackenzie, Piper).

As far as Laetwynn goes, such names must be relegated to middle names. That way if the kid wants to be unique they can (Eel's sister goes by her middle name, which is traditionally a last name), but if they want to completely ignore it, they have that option, too.
6/30/2004
 
Linus wrote:
That amount of history behind most names is exactly what makes it so hard for new ones to catch on. How is Kaden (the guy who works at the corner store) supposed to compete with Alexander (Alexander the Great, Alexander Graham Bell, and EIGHT popes)?

Women's names might be less Biblical because the Bible is less women-oriented (whether this is because of the men who wrote it or the culture of the times).

When you think about it, it's really unfair to name a kid when they're born. Maybe you're right, it's best to give them a common first name, a middle name you hope might fit them, and let them choose. Or maybe just let them choose their own names as a right of passage into manhood/womanhood.
6/30/2004
 
R. Alex wrote:
I think that you're right, to a degree. On the other hand, names are passed down within a family more than they are taken from the greats (I was named for my father and grandmother in my first and second names respectively), so Kaden may well have a Kaden son and so forth.

Will they ever be as popular as John, Paul, or Michael? In the short-term it's possible, but the trend (at least in the US) away from names that everyone else has (the name Jennifer, for instance, is really popular for kids our age but not for those ten years younger than we), I imagine it will indeed be difficult for the name to get a foothold and become as prominant as the names that go back generations all the way back to the Bible, early English history, or a conquerer of some sort.
6/30/2004

Add an Observation

Comment spam is an ongoing problems that we're trying to address. Previously we required people to create accounts and log in. I am thankful to say that is no longer the case. We're giving Captcha another try and are playing around with a text-based Q&A variant of Captcha. So bear with us as we try to figure out how to best get a handle ont he problem. Please note that any comment on a post more than 30 days old will go into the moderation queue, where I will get to it when I can which could be once a week.

:

:
:



 

 

Home || RSS || Archives || Ten Second News || FURL || Blogrolodexical (Full)