Oh, Your Cheatin' Heart....
R. Alex Whitlock
An interesting article on spousal infidelity on the wife's side. As the gap between unfaithful husbands and wives narrows (unfortunately in the wrong direction with wives going up instead of husbands going down), it poses some interesting questions on how and why wives cheat.

The "types" of affairs read to me more like rationalizations than anything else:
Empowering Affairs
With more opportunities for women in all aspects of life, they have increased experience of younger men and of workplace affairs.

Sex-Driven Affairs
The marriage becomes old and sex declines. This type of affair compensates for that lack. It is by definition the most passionate, lacking boundaries or rules and can almost seem like an out-of-body experience for the woman.

Love Affairs
Unanticipated and heartbreaking, these affairs happen when women least expect them. Often they break up the marriage or are used as a wake-up call for the husband to battle for his wife to stay.

Self-Esteem Affairs
Consumed with the responsibilities of child care and household duties, women have lost their way. A lover makes them feel special in a way their husbands do not.

Whether a woman or a man, I take an anti-cheating position when it comes to marital affairs. It's almost sad that I have to feel the need to take a "position" because so many people are increasingly permissive towards it.

For the record, I have a solid, albeit not entirely unblemished, record of fidelity. When mistakes have been made, they've been minor (ie no sex, Clinton-defined or otherwise) and dealt with very seriously. In other words, I've not only felt guilty, but I've done something about it.

As that goes, none of these rationales hold much water for me.

Empowering Affairs

This one is a very involved subject I'll have to tackle at a later date, except for a few thoughts. This, along with the third factor (increased availability) probably accounts a great deal for the closing of the gap.

In this case, I'm sure many women - particularly if they marry young or were not promiscuous when they were single - feel that they are missing out on something. This accounts for whatever transgressions I may have had in the past. That being said, it doesn't excuse me any more than it excuses the women in the survey (except to the extent my transgressions were more minor and dealt with honestly).

Sex-Driven Affairs

This excuse is the one most commonly afforded by men and is possibly the least unreasonable. I say this with two qualifications and a clarification.

First, it can't be ex-post facto. In other words, saying "I didn't realize how much I missed intimacy until Pat came along..." doesn't cut it.

Second, the other partner can't know what the first doesn't tell them. If the husband or wife is not aware of the other's unmet sexual needs, the guilt falls on the cheating spouse alone. It would be nice to say "My man/woman should know when I'm unhappy" and indeed it is nice when they do, but sexual issues often lag behind other issues and clear vision of the relationship becomes unclear. As I've said before, it's not a spouse's job to be a mindreader.

Lastly, to avoid letting the jilted spouse off completely, if a partner voices his or her concerns about the lack of intimacy (be it sexual or otherwise, especially since sexual often follows otherwise) and these complaints go unresponded to, then there's enough blame to go around.

To put a finer point on it, I believe that intimacy is a requirement in a marriage. Sex every night isn't, nor is she required to do the various positions that he wants or vice-versa, but a partner who doesn't even try to sexually satisfy his or her spouse is as negligent as one who is not providing in other ways.
"To avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband. 3 Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband. 4 The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife. 5 Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency. 6 But I speak this by permission, and not of commandment. 7 For I would that all men were even as I myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that." - 1 Cor. 7:2-7 KJV

Naturally, not everyone is in the mood every night. There will be times when a man or woman is physically incapable of sex. However, "not in the mood" headaches or stressful days at work that reach out for weeks or months is creating a situation in which an otherwise faithful spouse would stray. Don't even get me started on those who use sex as a weapon or to "teach him/her a lesson."

Even if one isn't in the mood, they can at least try. If they are impotant or dry, there are other ways intimacy and sexual needs can be satisfied. Refusal of compromise puts the other person in an impossible situation.

There are times that's unavoidable, which is what makes compromise and communcation on this matter so important. It requires compromise on both sides as to what their partners will and will not do.

That one side or the other isn't being completely satisfied does not constitute a valid rationale for cheating.

Self-Esteem Affairs

This rationale for cheating is subject to a number of the same rules as the second. The jilted spouse will often deserve some of the blame, but this sort of thing is also often derived ex-post facto.

Just as intimacy is required of both parties, so too is the emotional needs. To an extent. I have run across many women in my life (and a few men) whose self-esteem has become too heavy an anchor for any guy. Men, fearing her well-being if they were to leave, do what they can, fall short, and get cheated on. The same has happened in reverse, I'm sure, though I've not seen it first-hand (or perhaps guys are less likely to use self-esteem as a rationale even when it might be).

I am a believer in the credo that happiness is an inside job. There are things the spouse can be doing (and specifically things they can not be doing) to improve things, but at the end of the day we all feel down sometimes. We all feel worthless and stressed and worn down. It's the spouse's job to do what he or she can to keep things afloat, but just because he or she can't doesn't mean that you're free to go off and find someone that can.

Conclusion

To me, the last two reasons are both part of the same coin. There is, in relationship, a belief that they should be constantly reinvigorated. Every month together ought to be life the first.

The truth is that relationships change over time. That's not to say that sex will stop, intimacy will dissipate, and so on. Rather, that there are certain trade-offs. A lot of men and women look back at the earlier stages of their relationship and think that things were better back then. He said so many nice things and she was so much more aggressive in bed and so on.

Except that during that time, one of the biggest fuels to the flame was uncertainty. They did many of those things to try to win their partner over. Things were new and exciting. Well, excitement cannot exist without uncertainty, and it strikes me that a lot of men and women out there are trying to inject excitement into their life. By doing so, of course, they have to sacrifice the increased certainty they had before.

Except that in many cases the uncertainty is a deferred payment. They can have the excitement now and then go home to a stable family situation. These things have a tendency to blow up and the consequences are disastrous when they do.

Even when they don't, however, they're still irreversably damaging. Once you've crossed that line, you can't uncross it. You can no longer honestly say that you've been a great spouse. That sort of thing eats away at your soul because once you've cheated, it becomes easier to cheat again. With each bout of unfaithfulness, there comes a numbing to it until eventually the numbness bleeds over to your feelings for your partner.

And what's the cure to that numbness? Another lover, of course.
Posted to Women and Men
 
 

Observations

 
kevin whited wrote:
I dunno. I think it makes for good drama when Ayn sends her husband downstairs to his "art studio" so she can do the dirty with Nathaniel. No doubt it gave her writing a extra punch on those days (so to say).
8/24/2003
 
RAW wrote:
As Kris Kristofferson said: "Does a man have to be a son of a bitch every day of his life just to write a few songs?"

In his intro to Insomnia and Texas, Dub Miller adds (not sure if this is part of the Kristofferson quote), "No, but it sure helps."
8/24/2003
 
Ron wrote:
"biggest fuels to the flame was uncertainty. They did many of those things to try to win their partner over. Things were new and exciting. Well, excitement cannot exist without uncertainty"

I'm not certain I would say that it is uncertainty as it is novelty. Novelty, the desire to do something new, is a powerful force in the human psyche. And often people have affairs because they want to do something new.

Of course this isn't an excuse. And having ecstatically been married 15 years, I can tell you it is possible to do new stuff in and out of bed without having to commit adultery.

"However, "not in the mood" headaches..."

My wife and I have a saying dealing with headaches. "Sex cures headaches"
8/26/2003
 
Texas T-Bone wrote:
Sex does cure headaches.

For several months after having our first child, my wife had no interest in sex. We remained close with nonsexual intimacy and, while, it didn't satisfy all the urges I had, I certainly would not have turned elsewhere for satisfaction (well, except those times alone ... ahem).

When sex returned, it was even better because of how close we continued to become. Feels like the first time! It was much better because of the nonsexual intimacy we'd built. Even novelty can't trump intimacy in our relationship.
8/26/2003
 
R. Alex wrote:
Ron brings up a very good point with the distinction between uncertainty and novelty. I think you're on to something with novelty perhaps being a bigger driving force than anything else.

As I mentioned in the post, and which T-Bone exemplified in his comment, communication and compromise are key to a lot of things. That T-Bone was able to make those sacrifices in the shorter term and that it wasn't a permanent state of affairs for her is an example of how people can work things out.
8/26/2003
 
Marci wrote:
Interesting...I'd like to add a little something. First of all, I would never cheat on my husband. He has cheated on me. We've split up twice over it. Call me silly, that's another story entirely. Anyway, since we split the second time, I've come to learn to understand why it does happen more often than not (literally everyone I know has been affected by it) - at least I can speak for myself. IF I were ever to cheat, it would be because my "love bank" was getting no deposits. My husband and I have very different ideas of "romance", etc. I am coming to accept that he will never be as "tender" and "romantic" like I wished. He won't even try very much. When I get really down, I think of how I could stay with him, but get tenderness elsewhere. I won't, mind you, but I think of it. I can't help what I yearn for. Can I?
8/26/2003
 
Martin wrote:
Alex,

Long time, no comment.

This is a good post Alex. I found it very stimulating.

I have cheated on my spouse and have had my spouse cheat on me. And I have come to the conclusion that cheating is nothing more than a certain lack of integrity within an individual. And if not a lack of integrity, at least a lack of maturity.

There are no good rationales for an affair. An affair by either party is inexcusable. Engaging in an affair is a choice a person makes. Either party has the opportunity to say "no" but makes a conscious decision to say yes. And a party enters into an affair knowing that his or her actions will result in lots of pain to lots of people. Yet we do it anyway. So is that a lack of integrity? Or a lack of maturity? Or both.

So people can rationalize all they want. Call it "empowering" or "self esteem" or about sex or whatever. I think the reality is that it is a selfish, ego driven choice. Someone who is cheated on never fully recovers. And you're right, after the first, subsequent affairs become easier.

Good post, Alex. You touched a nerve - at least with me.
8/26/2003
 
RAW wrote:
Marci,

Thanks for chiming in. I don't disagree with you that not getting what one wants from their own relationship is incentive to cheat. I've read somewhere that most men that cheat haven't had sex with their spouses for over a year.

Stereotypically speaking, for women it's more likely to be emotional intimacy. Then again, a guy can turn around and say "I'm not getting enough sex at home" and use that as a rationale, which makes it a double-edged sword.

I am inclined to think, however, that most people ought to know what they're getting in to when they marry a man's man who isn't in to intimacy or a woman with a lower sex drive.

One of the more positive aspects of the sexual revolution is that stereotypes about women, men, and sex (that men want it and women don't so much) are being shattered, whether they were ever true or not.

Another positive aspect of it is from the men's side, which is that guys are becoming less stoic and more tender and so on. I criticize the notion of the "new man" periodically - mostly as something most women say they want but end up passing up - but all in all I do view it as a positive change as guys who are more genuinely emotional don't have to hold back due to social pressure.
8/27/2003
 
RAW wrote:
Martin,

Good to see you again. I agree with you, of course. I've quasi-cheated before, which I may write about at some point, but I did everything I could to make it right. I've only been cheated on once, which I will definitely write about some time because it's a rather funny story (only because it wasn't a serious relationship, despite what my sixteen year old thought at the time).
8/27/2003
 
Marci wrote:
Raw, I love that, "you knew what you were getting into". That's rich. In fact, I've said it before, too, to people..."TOO BAD". Yes, I knew what I was marrying. I knew that I was pregnant and there was love and commitment between us and that I wanted to marry this man. This doesn't stop a need in me to feel (for lack of a better word) "needed" or nurtured or whatever. Not all the time, but some of the time. More than I am getting presently. It's not always like that. Sometimes it's great. But I'm damaged goods, RAW. That's not an excuse, it's true. I had many problems with my totally unloving mother and then to marry a man who I thought would never lie or cheat on me...and he did. Logically, I know and practice healthy behaviors, but my heart still yearns when it's not getting what it's starved for.
Anyway, yes, I think (hope) you are right that the stereotypes are lifting....for the better!
8/27/2003
 
RAW wrote:
Marci,

There's nothing wrong with yearning, so long as you don't use that as an excuse to cheat.

I am very sorry to the extent that you are unhappy, and while I can't say I believe that gives you license to do whatever you wish (and I know that's not what you're asking for), I greatly respect your decision to have the child and marry the father. I'm sorry that things didn't work out as you might have liked, but I find it very admirable.
8/27/2003
 
Marci wrote:
Aw, heck, maybe I'm just in a mood...I do love my husband. It's only just recently that I can see wanting more.

But that's ok. I'll be fine. And honest. I think I can do both, haha.
8/28/2003
 
Dan wrote:
My wife has had a fling or two and will not talk to me about it. She will not even admit to anything other than conversation. I have found notes and hotel bills that say otherwise. How do I get her to talk?
9/15/2004

Add an Observation

Comment spam is an ongoing problems that we're trying to address. Previously we required people to create accounts and log in. I am thankful to say that is no longer the case. We're giving Captcha another try and are playing around with a text-based Q&A variant of Captcha. So bear with us as we try to figure out how to best get a handle ont he problem. Please note that any comment on a post more than 30 days old will go into the moderation queue, where I will get to it when I can which could be once a week.

:

:
:



 

 

Home || RSS || Archives || Ten Second News || FURL || Blogrolodexical (Full)