Tuesday, June 20, 2006
Road Trip '06
Mike Ahlf
One of the things I do once or twice a year (about once a year on average) is drive back home to visit my parents. For many people, this is no big deal.

For me, it's the 1200 mile journey from Houston to Milwaukee. But even with gas prices as high as they are, the cost compares favorably to flying, and I get a lot more cargo space to work with, as well as not having to rent or beg the use of a car while I'm there.

A few observations on the states traveled:
Texas - I live here. It's nice enough heading up TX-59, mostly. Watch out for the construction. Oh, and about the whole "Drive friendly" thing... someone needs to remind your average Texan about it.
Arkansas - One of the things scientists have discovered is that without any concrete detail or differentiating moments to latch on to, the human brain tends to compress a given long experience into about 8 seconds in terms of memory. Arkansas, therefore, takes 8 seconds to cross. In reality, it takes about 5 hours.
Missouri - BumpbumpbumpbumpBumpbumpbumpbumpbumpbumpBumpBump.....
Illinois - For most of the journey? "I hope that's the road, and not my alignment going." In Chicago? Hell beyond hell. At least in Texas when they have a toll road, they give you the (admittedly slightly slower) alternative of driving on a working feeder. In Chicago, if you want to get to Wisconsin, you either drive a full hour out of your way, or you pay about $6 worth of tolls. Your corrupt officials at work, folks.
Wisconsin - Ah, home sweet JESUS WHAT HAVE THEY DONE TO THE TOWN?! (Let's just say my old hometown's grown a bit).

Also, a Google Maps exercise.
Take Google Maps driving directions generator, and map from Houston, TX to Milwaukee, WI. You'll see that the route given goes from Houston, to Marshall, over to Shreveport, back to Texarkana, over to West Memphis, up to St. Louis, and then finally to Chicago and then Milwaukee.

Now, map in series. Map from Houston to Texarkana (cuts Shreveport out of the equation). Map from Texarkana to Milwaukee and poof, St. Louis drops out as well - the route now correctly uses I-57, which goes straight diagonally right up Illinois.

Total time saved: approximately 4-5 hours drive. Google Guys, your driving direction algorithm needs some tuning up.
Posted to Miscellaneous with 2 observations
 
buy cheap softwarecheap softwareoem softwarecheap adobe acrobat 
Saturday, June 10, 2006
Quote of the Day: School Funding
R. Alex Whitlock
"Standardized test scores track wealth and poverty with frightening precision. Even the call for “equal” education spending misses the point. If this society wants to fulfill its stated ideals, it must provide disproportionate talent and spending in the earliest years for those students whose family environment does not foster college preparation." -Oakland Mayor -Jerry Brown
Posted to Quotable Quoteries with 5 observations
 
buy cheap softwarecheap softwareoem softwarecheap adobe acrobat 
Tuesday, June 06, 2006
Oklahoma '06
R. Alex Whitlock
Memorial Day weekend we went to Kevin's annual Memorial Day float trip. Longtime readers and friends may recall that it was on one of these Memorial Day floats trips where Camille and I first met, so on top of being a fun trip, it's also a trip down memory lane and one of the most special trips that she and I can take with one another.

All in all we had a really good time. Next year the trip from Austin will be easier than flying from Utah/Idaho and we're very much looking forward to it.
Posted to Apropos el Dia with No observations
 
buy cheap softwarecheap softwareoem softwarecheap adobe acrobat 
Thursday, June 01, 2006
Libertarians Off The Deep End
R. Alex Whitlock
Tyler Cowen:
It's liability per se that isn't justified by libertarian standards. Under Lockean property rights theory, you own physical things, not the values of those things. It is for this reason that if you set up shop next to a competitor, you are not infringing his property rights, even if his business ends up being worth less. So let's say I steal your painting. Yes, you do deserve your painting back. It is yours. But say I steal your painting and lose it or wreck it. That should be the end of the story. You never owned the "value of that painting." You simply owned the physical painting. You are not due compensation. If you take my money as compensation for your loss, that is simply another theft.

So next time someone smashes in Tyler Cowen's window, let us remind him that he is due no compensation.

Have libertarians always been this eager to outlibertarianize everyone else? It's almost like with the advent of the blogosphere and the connections of libertarian cells nationwide therein, they have found their individuality encroached by too many people actually agreeing with them.
Posted to This Modern World with 2 observations
 
buy cheap softwarecheap softwareoem softwarecheap adobe acrobat
California Jumps Off The Deep End
R. Alex Whitlock
Wha tthe heck?
Under a bill passed by the Assembly, California would join an interstate compact in which states would agree to cast their electoral votes not for the winner in their jurisdictions but for the winner nationwide. Proponents say that would force candidates to broaden their reach to major population centers such as California.

The bill is part of a 3-month-old movement driven by a Bay Area lawyer and a Stanford computer science professor. The same 888-word bill is pending in four other states and is expected to be introduced in every state by January, its sponsors say. The legislation would not take effect until enough states passed such laws to make up a majority of the Electoral College votes — a minimum of 13 states, depending on population.

"This is a bill that would allow California to be able to play a role in presidential elections," said Barry Fadem, the Lafayette, Calif., lawyer spearheading the drive. Now, because the state is largely ignored, he said, "A vote in California is not equal to a vote in Ohio, and everyone would concede that."

Wow. What a monumentally stupid bill. If this goes through, a California vote has even less weight because a voter in Texas has as much weight for California's electoral votes as does a voter that actually lives in the state -- and the Texan's vote counts for Texas, too! If they're interested in empowering what are admittedly relatively unimportant votes in California, then go the Maine route where electoral votes are divided by district rather than the whole state. Or dole them out in proportion to the vote within the state.

I gotta give the legislature credit, though. This bill empowers Republicans (under this, Bush would have gotten California's electoral votes in 2004) but it was Democrats that pushed it through and Republicans that oppose it.

Posted to Head of State with 5 observations
 
buy cheap softwarecheap softwareoem softwarecheap adobe acrobat
Home || RSS || Archives || Ten Second News || FURL || Blogrolodexical (Full)